Asi said the gains in a v6 limited by the valve train wont be massive.. but if the current rods need replacing etc.. worth doing.. much easier to turbo or super charge any engine if power is the goal.. if improving the natually aspirated busso is the goal harder to achieve while retaining the N/A characteristic. ive done the above big turbos
Anaturally aspirated, high revving, great sounding Alfa engine. The shame is Alfa never gave us a modern RWD car with the Busso. The 3.0 and 3.2 deserved to have been in a RWD coupe with manual transmission. As nice as the Giulia is, it is still a 4-door large car. Most of them are 4-pot and diesels and automatic.
Allthe way down to the chrome intake runners. The “Busso” V6 manages to make the car feel and sound a lot faster than it actually is, and that’s not something every engine can accomplish.
AlfaRomeo GT 3.2 V6 Novitec. Location: Singapore. Report post. Posted September 10, 2013. I am skimming it enough to get the compression up to 11:1. I have the stock cams re-profiled to have slightly better lift duration. Mild Fast Road cams I would suppose. The Plenum and TB are going in as well.
Iam looking at buying my first Alfa and more specifically a Busso. Probably in the shape of a GT 3.2 V6 manual that seems to make the most sense. Supported Alfa Romeo Models. Alfa 147, 156 & GT Advice on GT 3.2 V6 Busso or GTA Purchase. 15333 Views 67 Replies 19 Participants Last post by Binji, Jun 18, 2018 Jump to Latest
Pleasesupport my channel by either subscribing to Patreon or donating to my paypal account.100% funds donated will go back into my YouTube channel. PATREON
. 285 196 158 256 172 96 21 399 224
alfa romeo gt 3.2 v6 busso
